tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-80330884411377848872024-03-14T03:52:41.557-07:00Good Question PoliticsA GOOD QUESTION stimulates thought, debate, and conversation. A good answer can influence, expose, and inspire others.Collinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07068344248586535462noreply@blogger.comBlogger19125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8033088441137784887.post-3587364840370473202011-06-21T05:08:00.000-07:002011-06-21T05:08:29.034-07:00You Think You're Free?<div style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', 'Bitstream Charter', Times, serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px;"><a data-mce-href="http://collinhedegard.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/img_1638.jpg" href="http://collinhedegard.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/img_1638.jpg"><img alt="" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-102" data-mce-src="http://collinhedegard.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/img_1638.jpg?w=225" height="300" src="http://collinhedegard.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/img_1638.jpg?w=225" style="border-bottom-width: 0px; border-color: initial; border-left-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-top-width: 0px;" title="IMG_1638" width="225" /></a></div><div style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', 'Bitstream Charter', Times, serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px;"><br />
</div><div style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', 'Bitstream Charter', Times, serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px;">You think you're free? I know we in the United States are far and away the most free of any citizens of the world. Yeah, yeah... I know there is this freedom index and that freedom index that place us second or fifth or thirteenth. Bull! I don't buy those for a minute because freedom cannot be quantified by stats and averages.</div><div style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', 'Bitstream Charter', Times, serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px;"><br />
</div><div style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', 'Bitstream Charter', Times, serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px;">Have a look at the big picture. Human nature is to seek freedom. In other words, the heart of every human wants to be free. Governments create a much different perspective as to 'free from what?'. For example, women in the Middle East might desire to be free to drive a car or remove a mask. Us Americans may desire to be free from our 9-5 or free from our commitment to mow the grass at church. There's a big difference, but we want what we know is out there... don't we.</div><div style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', 'Bitstream Charter', Times, serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px;"><br />
</div><div style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', 'Bitstream Charter', Times, serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px;">As far as 'freedom index', these indices are simply propaganda. If Denmark or wherever is more free, why are people not sneaking in there? Why are immigrants not flocking there? The frank truth is that people want to be here - right here in the United States. We have the only true civil society and celebrate the most personal freedom of any country. This freedom exists today despite the efforts of Progressives to exchange our freedoms for safety, the safety of a centralized State.</div><div style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', 'Bitstream Charter', Times, serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px;"><br />
</div><div style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', 'Bitstream Charter', Times, serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px;">Something Mark Levin (whom I feel provides very intelligent commentary and analysis, despite his abrasive personality) said a couple weeks ago has been burned into my thoughts. He asked, "You think you're free? Just try to build something innocuous in your own damn yard like a playground or something... "</div><div style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', 'Bitstream Charter', Times, serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px;"><br />
</div><div style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', 'Bitstream Charter', Times, serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px;">He is exactly right. Even our own personal property is not ours to do as we please. We've got neighborhood associations, local ordinances, this rule, that rule... Can't do this, can't do that. Nope, can't plant a tree. Nope, can't build a fence. Nope, can't put up a tall sign for your business. We are merely free to play within the guidelines created for us over the decades. Though still mostly free, this creates some perspective.</div><div style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', 'Bitstream Charter', Times, serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px;"><br />
</div><div style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', 'Bitstream Charter', Times, serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px;">Progressives have succeeded in building an over-legislated society over the last hundred years. Do we really need hundreds of laws passed every year, from both a federal Congress and State Assemblies? Why don't we spend a decade or so repealing and reducing the legislative monstrosity of regulation already in place? Maybe every law written and passed should have a sunset of 50 years... Let the next generation decide if it worked out or is still necessary. What do you think?</div><div style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', 'Bitstream Charter', Times, serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px;"><br />
</div><div style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', 'Bitstream Charter', Times, serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px;">Enjoy your weekend!</div>Collinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07068344248586535462noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8033088441137784887.post-20179599293556044832011-03-20T06:48:00.000-07:002011-03-20T06:52:48.756-07:00Are You Better Off?<img src="" /><br />
<br />
Are you better off than you were two years ago? Do you know anyone that is better off now than they were a couple years ago? For me, it's pretty clear that everyone is worse off. Many are much worse off.<br />
<br />
The local cigar shop has a small, makeshift sitting area for guys to sit down and enjoy a cigar. Yes, in Indiana we are still allowed to smoke in some places... for now. So, this week I sat down with the six or seven fellows and lit up a Padron 3000 maduro. The discussion was candid and depressing.<br />
<br />
Of the seven of us sitting there: three were unemployed and looking for jobs, one feels underemployed and is looking for a better job, and two of us own businesses which are fighting for every dollar. To top that off, gas went up over $3.50 per gallon and a cart full of groceries costs about $20 more... tough times for all.<br />
<br />
As the discussion continued, it occurred to me that these older, wiser, experienced guys are seeing something different this time. In the past, these guys had roughed it through by tapping into savings or skipping expensive vacations. One business owner had lessened his margins just to get jobs and keep his guys working. Though we are taking these measures now, there is not much promising news after more than two years of this.<br />
<br />
Personally, I believe things are about to get worse. Consider the state of things across the U.S. and around the world:<br />
<ul><li>Middle East is ON FIRE and it is spreading</li>
<li>Japan is devastated</li>
<li>Europe is crashing </li>
<li>China is capitalizing and nefariously manipulating it's currency</li>
<li>Total U.S. Employment is the lowest in DECADES</li>
</ul><div>Now, combine all that turmoil with the confusing fact that U.S. Markets (Stocks) are performing pretty well...??? What does this mean? See, our economy and our markets are NOT one in the same. While the economy struggles to recover, businesses don't necessarily suffer the same fate.</div><div><br />
</div><div>Consider this example: A corporation reduces a department staff through attrition by 10%. Though employees fuss, the work still gets done. After further attrition, another 15% are gone, but the work is still getting done... hmm. Granted, the environment is not good for employees to fuss or threaten to leave - there are NO jobs for them to move into! </div><div><br />
</div><div>So, the end result of this exercise is that businesses get their necessary work done with less employees. Less expense means more net income, which, in turn means better performance and higher equity valuations. That's the business perspective - more profitability, more efficiency, and higher share value.</div><div><br />
</div><div>The flip side of this sad story... in our example 25% of the department's workforce was under performing and expendable. The employees that remain could have been working harder and many were getting paid for showing up. That is the sad truth, and the reason for the strange circumstances of a strong market with a crushed economy. </div><div><br />
</div><div>As for our Administration, we are about to experience the crippling effects of deficit spending and enormous budget growth. Pressure to raise taxes and cut benefits is coming. The irony is that the answer is cutting taxes, reducing Government and regulation, and empowering people to invest in themselves. </div><div><br />
</div><div>As I smoked that cigar, I felt thankful for all that I've got. I felt thankful for the incredible standard of living we enjoy, even during the toughest of times. Additionally, I feel hopeful that we will endure the next couple years of turmoil and ultimately reject the Liberal agenda of modern Government (including many GOP - moderates will also be rejected next election!). America's future depends on Conservatives acting - NOW!</div><div><br />
</div><div>POTUS, his agenda, his direction, and his Liberal Congress are all being rejected by America. The simple truths are that things are much worse for most Americans. Now, we understand why it's happening, which we haven't realized in years and elections past. </div>Collinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07068344248586535462noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8033088441137784887.post-86386100706701944852011-01-05T05:43:00.000-08:002011-01-05T05:43:57.372-08:00Tax Rates vs. Tax Revenue<img src="http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRGc6LdtbxvWPDX-Q2lB51pOaVxg7Ez6oHsRIatkSJxtENJswlEpg" /><br />
<br />
Tax Rates vs. Tax Revenue<br />
<br />
Frankly, I've heard enough of this tax debate. 'Tax the rich' or 'only the top 1%' are spouted off from the mouths of progressives and liberals while others seem to be happy with the way things are. Simply studying history will reveal that this experiment has been going on for a hundred years. Every generation tries to raise taxes or punish the rich - IT HAS FAILED TO INCREASE REVENUE in each and every case! Don't believe me, read this:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2003/08/the-historical-lessons-of-lower-tax-rates">http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2003/08/the-historical-lessons-of-lower-tax-rates</a><br />
<br />
This article sheds light on the consequences of lowering tax rates. What ends up happening is, simply put, prosperity. Here's the rub, tax rates effect revenue but the relationship is inverse. In other words, if you lower one then the other goes up and vice versa. Every time we have lowered tax rates, Government revenue has gone through the roof. Every time we have raised tax rates, the U.S. economy has slowed.<br />
<br />
Do you see the ultimate irony here? Liberals want to provide more services and entitlements, all of which cost lots of money. They also want to raise tax rates, which 'THEORETICALLY' will increase revenue (only in theory as history gives proof) but now we know will LOWER GOVERNMENT REVENUES. If liberals lowered tax rates they would have money piled up to the ceiling to spend on whatever they wanted! Funny, isn't it. This makes me wonder, are they really looking out for 'the people' or 'middle class'?<br />
<br />
We Conservatives want to lower tax rates, both individual and corporate, because of the certain prosperity that would ensue. America would return to work, companies would invest and grow exponentially, and the $14 Trillion deficit would begin shrinking. See, this action would generate more revenue for the Federal Government. Now, how to spend all the extra money sounds like a nice problem for a future Congress to have.<br />
<br />
So, why don't liberals study history and get on board? It's my opinion that they are simple ideologues, hungry for power. Maybe they just want to oppose Conservative Republicans... it's clear the current group of lib Democrats despise Ronald Reagan and resent his success. Their pursuit of these dysfunctional policies is a mystery to me, but in the end their experiment will fail. Conservatives will be there to pick up the pieces and get the ship on the right course... again.Collinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07068344248586535462noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8033088441137784887.post-35038428146955903232010-12-15T05:27:00.000-08:002010-12-15T05:27:11.948-08:00Who Wants to 'Punish' the Rich?<img src="http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSlOaGayoQGn2lg41MJ0TfC2kbarSqDlXcOSR6cU3diokOxeF_O" /><br />
<br />
Do we really 'hate' the rich? Liberals have created this aura or perception, but is it based on any public will or feeling? I don't believe it for a minute. In fact, I believe that most Americans have an admiration and curious interest with the rich. That's because I believe that most Americans hope to become rich!<br />
<br />
As a teenager, I took a job as a caddy at Broadmoor Country Club in Indianapolis. It was a great job for two reasons. First, the job introduced me to golf, which is the greatest game and can be played throughout life. Secondly, I had first hand access to successful, rich people for hours at a time.<br />
<br />
As I observed the members of the club, I began to notice a number of fascinating details about their lives. Most impressive to a teenage boy was the fact that they drove nice cars, had new golf clubs, and wore nice branded clothes. Simple envy or respect for the lifestyle made me (the teenager) want to be like these folks.<br />
<br />
As it turns out, the more subtle characteristics of the rich are the most important aspects of their success. Most of the successful people I caddied for were in fact <b><u>Entrepreneurs</u></b>, that is, small business owners. There were some trust fund - family money members, there were also a handful of Corporate members and big business execs (now referred to as 'fat cats' or 'fat cat bankers'), but not that many. The majority of the members were simply entrepreneurs, owning and running smaller business or working for themselves.<br />
<br />
Another characteristic that was revealed during their rounds of golf - strong and competitive nature. Most of them hated to lose, even if it was a $10 nassau with their buddies on a Saturday morning. They were hungry, competitive people with an expectation for winning. From my view, they were winning in life.<br />
<br />
To wrap up the story of my exposure to the 'Rich', it must be said that I never experienced any ill will or 'hatred' for the members of Broadmoor C.C. In fact, quite the opposite was true. I found myself admiring and studying these people, wanting to eventually be among them.<br />
<br />
<b>Perspective on 'Punishing' the Rich</b><br />
<b><br />
</b><br />
As Liberals gear up for punishing the rich, I got to thinking about what should be done to them... What do everyday Americans think the 'rich' should be tasked with? What if we...:<br />
<br />
<ul><li>Force the rich to pay <b><i>DOUBLE </i></b>the tax rate of average people</li>
<li>Establish deductions that are insignificant to rich, only helping middle income families significantly</li>
<li>Force extra taxes on the rich, such as employment taxes and high corporate tax rates</li>
<li>Regulate them and their businesses, making it difficult to engage in commerce </li>
</ul><div>See, we <b>ALREADY </b>do all of these things to the alleged 'rich'. What further action should we take to punish them? How much of their hard earned money would Liberals like the Government to take (I say <b>STEAL</b>).</div><div><br />
</div><div>My opinion is that anyone who wants to punish the 'rich' must have given up hope that they themselves will ever be 'rich'. There's simply no justification for further measures. Frankly, there isn't justification for the status quo as the 'rich' are already treated quite differently, aren't they?</div><div><br />
</div><div>Tomorrow, I've got a great addendum to this article regarding TAX RATES. Here's the teaser question: Does the Government (both parties) want <b>higher tax rate</b>s (percentages) or <b>more tax revenu</b>e (dollars collected)? The two are mutually exclusive... more tomorrow.</div>Collinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07068344248586535462noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8033088441137784887.post-39758215177225821142010-12-14T10:13:00.000-08:002010-12-14T10:13:34.902-08:00Liberty Lands a Left Hook!<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiHdBj-bXGPRJhygO3bPy9T2KYZKI1HUtjh2r1MBrGJIBM8tKd5d5K3GeUKe_ti-Pq0nt6YS7Lu8yq8LBJUG8cjzWEiZ3iHInKoNzVAcXID88nSKqhi8IyiLsGEhtSre7vhcnUolbWzGA9u/s1600/IMG_1638.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiHdBj-bXGPRJhygO3bPy9T2KYZKI1HUtjh2r1MBrGJIBM8tKd5d5K3GeUKe_ti-Pq0nt6YS7Lu8yq8LBJUG8cjzWEiZ3iHInKoNzVAcXID88nSKqhi8IyiLsGEhtSre7vhcnUolbWzGA9u/s320/IMG_1638.JPG" width="240" /></a></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br />
</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">Liberty Landed a Left Hook to the Health Care Bill yesterday, ruling it to be 'unconstitutional' with respect to the Commerce Clause. Many of us Conservatives have known this to be true, simply waiting for the rulings to come down the pike. Though we feel good today, basking in the victory, we should not rest easily. There is no telling what can happen with our Judicial systems. </div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br />
</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">Ultimately, it is undoubtedly now on path for a Supreme Court decision within the next year or two. The sooner the better, for a number of reasons. First, the longer we wait to strike this monstrosity down the more damage is done. Additionally, the longer the business community is paralyzed and will continue to sit on it's cash. Secondly, as it stands we will likely enjoy a 5-4 victory in the Supreme Court on the Constitutionality of the 'Law'. By waiting, we simply jeopardize that outcome as accidents happen. As a side note, Kagan should recuse herself due to her involvement before this appointment. I don't expect that she will.</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br />
</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">The Virginia decision was very well reasoned and explained in the 42 page document. Ultimately, this legislation would open the door to unlimited State power to control the populous. Though this mandate and penalty (tax) are not enormous, the precedent cannot be allowed.</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br />
</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">What if next time the fine is $2,000 or $10,000 or more? What if the enforcement is clearly outlined that criminal punishment would fall on those that don't comply? What if the mandate was for using certain light bulbs or not eating celery with every meal? As you see, this door simply cannot be opened. That is the </div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">Road to Serfdom...</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br />
</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">Again, this is a nice victory. Be clear, we have a long way to go. Even if the mandate is ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court, what we have left is a law remaining in effect without one of it's 'crutches'. This will spell the doom of the private insurance industry, forcing a public option and flocking people toward the Government for help...</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br />
</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">My biggest fear is that this is by design... that's right. Think about it... when the system fails (and it will unless a full repeal happens) won't it be convenient to say, 'well, the judicial crippled any chance for success by stripping our mandate...' Is anything that this Administration does not part of some spooky Alinsky-esque plan? This just seemed too easy and clear cut, how could they have expected the mandate to be held up?</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br />
</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br />
</div>Collinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07068344248586535462noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8033088441137784887.post-58244321341979694362010-11-09T07:40:00.000-08:002010-11-10T05:58:11.207-08:00Landslide... Now What?<img src="http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcS2-D3AjS_2fmAxIBPE54A3zh_WiUBhN64d1EKG2ETSHIT9s1A&t=1&usg=__mo-cjjIKiJVrTmkNYsnopY823Bw=" /><br />
<br />
Conservatives and other Republicans have won a landslide victory of historic proportions in 2010! The GOP has gained control of the House, made headway within the Senate, and gained full control of many State Assembly and Governorships. What does it all mean?<br />
<br />
There have been a wide range of opinions and analysis of the epic defeat of Democrats throughout the U.S. though most are missing the plain and simple truth...<br />
<br />
<b>U.S. voters looked at ballots and voted for the MOST CONSERVATIVE CANDIDATE in each race. </b><br />
<b><br />
</b><br />
The exceptions to this result were Liberals and drones that were simply ushered to the polls and told how to vote (ie Union members, criminals, etc). Otherwise, it is my opinion that most of the voters did exactly that.<br />
<br />
In any event, the GOP clearly has been given another opportunity to exact the will of the American people. What is our will? Stop the movement in Government toward Socialism! Restore our freedoms and liberties that have been encroached upon in the last couple years! Reduce spending, the size of Government, and our taxes! Be transparent and cast votes on laws that reflect our desires! That's all we want.... Nothing more or less than that.<br />
<br />
It is also my opinion that the only thing that matters going forward is to introduce laws and vote to support a Constitutional Conservative agenda of limited Government, private property rights, and liberty. We, as an electorate, must reject any other action by continuing to vote out those that refuse to comply with this fundamental mandate.<br />
<br />
Forget the days of earmarks and bringing home the bacon - THOSE DAYS ARE OVER! This frivolous spending as well as rewarding special interests and constituent donors will be exposed and punished. Please utilize the new majority to pass votes for things like:<br />
<br />
<ul><li>Repeal of Obama's 'Health Care Reform Bill'</li>
<li>Repeal of Obama's 'Financial Reform Bill'</li>
<li>Eliminate earmarks</li>
<li>Immediate and significant reductions in Government spending - Across the BOARD!</li>
<li>Settle the tax increase concern issue - Lame duck can extend and the new Congress can make permanent</li>
<li>Protect the border or support border States to achieve a defined and safe Southern border</li>
</ul><div>The new congress also needs to be ready to keep the Lame Duck session in check. I'm not sure how they do this - threatening repeals or de-funding measures in the event this radical Congress gets frisky during their exit.</div><div><br />
</div><div>By proactively sending legislation to the Senate to be passed or obstructed, the GOP accomplishes two very important things:</div><div><ol><li>Submit legislation that reflects the will of the American people (in other words, 'do the right thing')</li>
<li>Get opponents of these legislative priorities on record (this includes POTUS if he vetoes bills)</li>
</ol><div>After this, we'll see if so called 'Blue Dog Democrats' are willing to step up against their own party. We'll also see who the real 'obstructionists' are. Also, just by a longshot, there is a chance we can get the U.S. back on the right track this year rather than waiting until 2013... Time will tell. I won't hold my breath...</div></div>Collinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07068344248586535462noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8033088441137784887.post-87913536865671254222010-10-05T06:59:00.000-07:002010-10-05T06:59:31.860-07:00Technically Speaking...<img height="200" src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2010/7/8/saupload_recession_2010_300x300.jpg" width="200" /><br />
<br />
Wasn't this a fantastic week? We all learned that the '<b>Recession</b>' ended during the Summer of 2009! See... technically speaking a recession ends when there are two consecutive quarters of positive growth in GDP. Well, the G (Government Spending) was heavily subsidized by stimulus spending which pushed us over the 'zero' mark and into positive territory - thus, recession over. Got it?<br />
<br />
To borrow from a popular SNL Weekend Update line... 'REALLY? REALLY?' Whatever is technically correct, most of America is not feeling like we've entered any sort of recovery. Unemployment is at 9.7% and new records are reached every month for poverty and other negative indicators. What's worse is that there is no hope for improvement. The Administration and Congressional leaders are telling us to get used to it, it's the 'new norm'. Should we accept this attitude, this defeatist attitude?<br />
<br />
What we don't hear is the usual spin from the Administration, bragging about ending the recession. Despite being 'technically' correct, they recognize the utter failure of the Recovery Summer campaign. See, Americans are beginning to see through the loopholes and <i>wordsmithing </i>of this academic conglomerate.<br />
<br />
Let's examine some other examples of the Administration being 'technically correct':<br />
<br />
<br />
<ul><li>'I've given tax breaks to business owners...' - Well, business owners can claim a $5,000 tax credit if they hire (not rehire) a new employee and employ them for a year. Though that sounds good on the surface, but consider the investment, costs, and implications of hiring a full time employee. To begin, a successful business owner will need to realize product demand for the addition. Second, an average salary of $40,000 will also require @$4,000 in employment taxes, $10,000 in benefits. To summarize, spend $54,000 per year and we'll give you $5,000 this year. How's that sound, even if there was growing demand for products and services?</li>
<li>'Tax breaks for working Americans...' - Many middle class employees got something like $13 per payday for a period of time. Don't spend it all in one place! Again, technically true. However, is it substantial help for families? </li>
<li>'We've increased border security...' - Again, technically true. 1,200 National Guardsmen have been deployed for technical support to Border Patrol Agencies. Side note, they cannot participate in CAPTURING BAD GUYS! Is the goal here to truly protect and defend our southern border? </li>
</ul><div>Doesn't this sound like someone covering their bases? When asked about their positions, these have been their answers. When dealing with these academic, elite folks - we need to ask the right questions and follow up with more specific questions. This will not be accomplished by the national media, so we are going to have to do it ourselves in Town Hall meetings and letters to Congress persons. </div><div><br />
</div><div>Here is the most disconcerting and subtle technically correct answer of them all... 'Are you a Socialist?' - POTUS, 'No, I am not a Socialist.'</div><div><br />
</div><div>See, technically speaking Obama is a MARXIST. Socialist understates his agenda. We need to ask the right questions with this guy. Got it? </div>Collinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07068344248586535462noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8033088441137784887.post-46868834786468441662010-08-05T06:51:00.000-07:002010-08-06T05:42:16.402-07:00Fourteenth Amendment: Context Matters<img src="http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQ_Hu8fDU_A4vFGI61nTe5zbkn_xgGRyBRAtOY3rcSGZlcw27Q&t=1&usg=___nrR4AwLhANzEqL-dVOxJ9FO5Ow=" /><br />
<br />
Section One of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution states the following:<br />
<br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px; border-collapse: collapse; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px;"><i>'All persons born or naturalized in the United States, <b>and subject to the jurisdiction thereof</b>, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.'</i></span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px; border-collapse: collapse; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px;"><br />
</span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px; border-collapse: collapse; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px;">Now, most will admit that 'common knowledge' suggests that 'if you are born here, you are automatically a citizen of the U.S.' Is that an accurate interpretation of the Amendment? What exactly does 'and subject to the jurisdiction thereof' mean? The actual text paints a much different picture on what common knowledge suggests, casting a cloud over the assumed citizenship of tens of thousands born here 'without jurisdiction'.</span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px; border-collapse: collapse; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px;"><br />
</span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px; border-collapse: collapse; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px;">Jurisdiction is defined by Webster as 'the power, right, or authority to apply the law' or 'the authority of a sovereign power to govern or legislate'. Taken a step further, subject or the phrase 'subject to' is defined as; 'living in the territory of, enjoying the protection of, and owing allegiance to a sovereign power or state'. Do illegal immigrants subject themselves to the laws of the U.S. or pay allegiance to America? The mere fact that by stepping across the border, their first act was in defiance of the laws of the land, tells us that answer is 'no'.</span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px; border-collapse: collapse; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px;"><br />
</span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: sans-serif; font-size: small;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px; border-collapse: collapse; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px;">It is my opinion that those persons present within the United States without legal status, AND thus the children born here to such families, are not 'subject to the jurisdiction thereof' and therefore not entitled to automatic citizenship. Now, this is just the meager opinion of an individual living in the Heartland. However, isn't it fair to introduce this concept for some open debate? Is it reasonable to give the Supreme Court the chance to weigh in on this topic, since there has not been such a decision to date? </span></span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: sans-serif; font-size: small;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px; border-collapse: collapse; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px;"><br />
</span></span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: sans-serif; font-size: small;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px; border-collapse: collapse; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px;">I believe it is very important, especially considering the present hotbed of immigration issues and problems, to carefully interpret and adhere to the Constitution. The Fourteenth Amendment was adopted in 1868. Though it's provisions helped to protect the rights of newly freed slaves - who were now HOLDING JURISDICTION within the United States after Emancipation in 1863 - the Amendment was pointed at overruling the Dred Scott decision. Does anyone really believe it was intended to create 'anchor babies' or a 'back-door' trick for gaining citizenship?</span></span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: sans-serif; font-size: small;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px; border-collapse: collapse; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px;"><br />
</span></span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: sans-serif; font-size: small;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px; border-collapse: collapse; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px;">United States citizenship is both valuable and desirable. Let's clear up these issues with new debate and perhaps a modern day Supreme Court ruling on the interpretation of the Amendment. Let us also define our sovereignty by closing and protecting and defending our borders and citizens. The Constitution is clear about this singular role of the Federal Government. </span></span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: sans-serif; font-size: small;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px; border-collapse: collapse; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px;"><br />
</span></span>Collinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07068344248586535462noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8033088441137784887.post-13688176543489109672010-07-28T19:00:00.000-07:002010-07-29T04:48:49.269-07:00Why Judge Appointments Cannot Be Taken Lightly...<img src="http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRj8_v9NuIWC4jveVbP4-9mtiMHEUquEj4JsbIlBl8AUATiNDg&t=1&usg=__X7ZWy5iNVdbdvkDwky1btE5VgT4=" /><br />
<br />
The activist ruling today on the components of the Arizona 'Immigration' Law is evidence that judgeships should not be appointed without heavy consideration. Over a decade ago, Clinton appointed Judge Bolton, which was seemingly inconsequential. Turns out, she would play an ENORMOUS role in today's political landscape. As the Administration tries to create chaos and tension, she just drove a divisive wedge between two aggravated groups on a collision course with conflict.<br />
<br />
Conservative talk radio commented today that the legal argument for an injunction must be very, very strong. Consider that the people of Arizona elected the legislators, who in turn are governing with the clear consent of the people. The Federal Government should take note of this, as about 60% of the people of America support this law. It carries even stronger support in Arizona, which has become dangerous as a result of the lack of enforcement and resources by Federal Border Agents.<br />
<br />
There are two giant problems with this issue and this Judge as well as the Administration are on the wrong side of both. First, the Federal Government is failing to enforce the existing immigration laws and protect our Southern border. The second problem is that the States have every right, frankly an obligation to it's citizens, to protect the residents.<br />
<br />
While the Judge will be touted and enjoy her fifteen minutes of fame, the Democrats will claim a victory here. Nonetheless, the righteous citizens of Arizona and the rest of the country realize that the 'war' in November will be won. This battle was lost because Liberals bought a trump card many years ago when Billy Clinton appointed this judge.<br />
<br />
This brings us back to the point - Judge appointments matter. Supreme Court appointments are very significant as they endure for life. Activist or politically strategic appointments are simply a trump card to be played at a later date. What might come before the court over the next decade? It is my opinion that every piece of destructive legislation this President and Congress have passed against our will should end up before the highest Court.<br />
<br />
Will judges like Kagan interpret laws and defend the Constitution? I'm afraid that the answer is not certainly 'yes', which means that she and other radical political allies should be voted down. The day will come when the toils of the Nation fall into the lap of one key person, one moment in time when a single vote matters.Collinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07068344248586535462noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8033088441137784887.post-28181141559694866202010-07-27T18:37:00.000-07:002010-07-27T18:37:11.670-07:00Why Don't We Fight to Win?<img src="http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQ03iWXLtFbXs6m7eBeu288kJNJAwE3BzPlEf2sSN4EIzONBP8&t=1&usg=__6CMTOUmRweRhy_N-QQlgwkMBhOo=" /><br />
<br />
Believe me, I'm far from anti-war. I am, however, against the pathetic version of modern 'international conflict' or whatever we call WAR these days. My understanding of war has always been simple - Destroy the enemy. Once the mission is accomplished, get the boys home and move on. When war is waged in this manner, the outcome is certain. The more determined, technologically advanced, more powerful force will win. Without a doubt, the U.S. Armed Forces has been that power for the last one hundred years.<br />
<br />
So, what is the problem with Iraq and Afghanistan? There is no question we took down Saddam within weeks and had his army on their knees, controlling the landscape within the first few months. The same circumstances exist in Afghanistan, Al Queda was toppled quickly and could no longer organize there. Despite effectively 'winning', we are still maintaining an enormous presence in both countries. Why?<br />
<br />
The canned answers are clear: rebuild them, install 'friendly' Governments, promote democracy... I get all that. Haven't we done all that before with countries like Lebanon, Iran/Iraq, and even Afghanistan? If so, why do we need to do it again? The frank truth is that the people of these countries cannot govern themselves, they require a constant policing. I'm reminded of that goofy satirical marionette movie - Team America: World Police. Unfortunately, it's no joke any more. <br />
<br />
The sad truth is that the Islamic societies of the world either can not or choose not to rise up against radicalism within their communities. As long as those radical members have homes and families, who know full well of their brothers and sons involvement in such movements, but continue to shelter and support them - they have nothing to fear. These radicals can terrorize, keep the fight going, and at the end of the day hide with the women and children of their communal family lifestyle.<br />
<br />
The fact is that our rules of engagement protect them. Americans carry with us a value for humanity unlike any other part of the world. It is this compassion for life and fellow mankind that both compels us to help and ruins our efforts to destroy the evil of the world. Americans also know that advanced societies are lands with laws, and those laws must be enforced.<br />
<br />
Let me pose the question: If you have a family member that you know has robbed a bank, murdered a police officer, and is now knocking on your door... will you provide them asylum and protection? Only the most uncivilized and worst among us would consider helping this person, family or not.<br />
<br />
This decision is more affected by principles than it is by fear, as we know even hardened criminals won't turn their weapons on their own family. Further, we know and understand that by agreeing to provide protection we are also GUILTY of a crime and taking a risk.<br />
<br />
It is my opinion that these terrorists (radical Muslims) must be made to live in fear of the long arm of the law. They can be safe nowhere, protected by no one. They must cower in caves and roam the streets, absconded by their own society that rejects their choices of action. Those that provide protection and asylum, they know who they are. These enablers should not be surprised when we knock down their door and enforce the law, and they won't if we make it the rule.<br />
<br />
Is it reasonable for us, Americans, to call on the supposed peaceful Islamic communities to begin policing their own? If people are truly for peace and don't support radicalism or terrorism, they should take a stand against such behavior and help the cause. Without such action of the masses or changes of the rules of engagement, we will not be able to accomplish the mission and destroy the enemy completely.<br />
<br />
With the cooperation and help of peace loving Muslims, we will rid the world of such terrible and destructive people. Either we wait for Islam to help or begin fighting to win, those are the choices.Collinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07068344248586535462noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8033088441137784887.post-18939629861433292142010-07-19T07:12:00.000-07:002010-07-19T07:25:10.978-07:00America: How Do You like having a 'Boot on Your Neck'?<img src="http://mattstone.blogs.com/.a/6a00d8341bffb053ef0128764507b4970c-200wi" /><br />
This Administration has bragged about keeping their <b><i>'boot on the throat'</i></b> of BP while they ultimately deal with the tragic oil spill. The real story is that the White House and Congress have had their boots on the throat of the entire tax paying private sector since they gained control of the Government. With every piece of destructive legislation they force through the Congress they are leaning on and choking our economy, along with every American that works and pays taxes.<br />
<div><br />
</div><div>The private sector is the force behind our amazing growth over the last two centuries. They are shackled in fear and uncertainty - afraid to invest, hire, or do much of anything! This is not due to normal economic cycles, but directly a result of legislative risk and the enormous impact to come of laws already in place.</div><div><br />
</div><div>Take for instance the overall cost of hiring a single employee. Say you own a small business that makes boots. Now, with a growing government that needs heavy boots to deal folks that pay taxes, you are considering adding another sales person to increase your market share. Good and experienced boot sales persons will earn a salary of $40,000. </div><div><br />
</div><div>Now, keep in mind that you (the employer) will be paying $2,400 in SS and Medicare taxes, around $1000 in unemployment insurance each year. Now you need to count on either paying around $12,000 in annual health care benefits for the new employee or pay thousands of $$$ in fines. What's that? You want to offer a low cost, high deductible plan with an HSA so you and employees save money... Sorry, can't do that any longer. You are going to have to offer a 'government approved' health plan (up until private insurance fails and we go to single payer) that covers what is mandated by those who know better than you.</div><div><br />
</div><div>Oh, while you gasp for air under that boot - keep in mind that those added expenses will apply to your existing employees too. They will probably demand more money since their taxes are going up in 2011. Your taxes will be going up too, and that applies to capital gains if you are incorporated. </div><div><br />
</div><div>So, the bottom line is that adding a sales person is going to cost you more like $60,000 each year. Combine that with the added costs of doing business with your current staff and rising taxes... How do you feel about hiring now? In fact, if sales don't go up your net income will be going down... Hmm, now you feel the 'choking' effect of legislative risk. What's the result here? You struggle and employees work harder to keep their jobs by increasing production and a boot sales person has to keep looking for a job and remain on welfare - <b>NO ONE WINS</b>!</div><div><br />
</div><div>The scariest part of all this is that Obama and his rubber stamp Congress is just getting started. They have done significant damage in less than two years! Now they have just passed 'Finance Reform' which brings a number of new industries under the boot. Is 'Cap and Trade' on the horizon, maybe during a Lame Duck session of Congress after they are voted out? What will the effects of increased supply and transportation costs do to your business?<br />
<br />
Americans need to <a href="http://goodquestionpolitics.blogspot.com/2010/05/2010-election-change-and-hope.html">Reject this Administration</a> and vote for conservative candidates this November!<br />
<br />
</div>Collinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07068344248586535462noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8033088441137784887.post-85883571852967906012010-05-28T06:37:00.000-07:002010-05-28T06:37:38.832-07:002010 Election: Change and HopeNow it's Change and Hope... That's right, this election is about fundamentally transforming the congress. We, the people of a free and enduring REPUBLIC, need to change out the existing leaders and replace them with conservatives. This does not mean elect republicans, but the most conservative candidates must be considered.<br />
<br />
Once we seat them, we have to hope that they will carry the political will to serve us by changing the course of our wayward ship. Let me rephrase that, we must DEMAND that they take the drastic measures to right our finances and get our economy back into action. If newly elected officials won't take appropriate action - we need to replace them and repeat the process until it works.<br />
<br />
So, that is the 'Change and Hope' we need for elections in 2010. Changing the leadership of Congress will only bring a halt to the radical agenda being pushed currently. We must have a conservative 'Super Majority' by 2012, otherwise the deep rooted and intentional damage to our economy and it's infrastructure will be tougher to overcome. This is the ONLY hope for maintaining the integrity of the United States we grew up knowing. If we do not act in the next two elections, the US will fall from glory as the 'Last Best Hope' for the world.<br />
<br />
Here is the Manifesto for our 2010 or 2012 Conservative Congress:<br />
<br />
<ul><li>Repeal Health Care Reform Bill, replace this with the sensible parts of the legislation that address rising costs </li>
<li>Reform Medicare and Social Security IMMEDIATELY - each year we wait to do this we inch closer to catastrophe. The pain will be less substantial the sooner it is done - it must be done.</li>
<li>Massive reductions in federal spending and programs, including entitlements.</li>
<li>Reductions in corporate tax rates to attract investment and inspire private sector growth</li>
<li>Secure ALL borders and travel into the United States, followed by a debate and plan for addressing existing illegal immigrants already here.</li>
<li>Restore relations with allies around the world</li>
<li>Bring clarity and conclusion to our war with Radical Islamic Extremists across the globe - These factions should fear the 'Fists of Justice', not us living in fear of them. </li>
</ul><div>Thanks for reading, enjoy the Memorial Day weekend and remember those that helped preserve the freedoms of our citizens!</div><div><br />
</div><div>Collin <span class="goog-spellcheck-word" style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: yellow; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial;">Hedegard</span></div>Collinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07068344248586535462noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8033088441137784887.post-9517587994254622982010-04-08T07:06:00.000-07:002010-04-08T07:08:02.315-07:00Don't We Already Redistribute Wealth?<b>Enough is enough</b>... How clear can it be that we already redistribute wealth within the United States? Efforts to further the already unbalanced and detrimental system of taxation and entitlements is pushing the limits of most Americans. Even before the controversial and inexplicable passing of '<i><b>ObamaCare</b></i>' the US has been redistributing wealth for decades. YES! It is very true, consider the following facts:<br />
<br />
<ul><li><b>The top 1% of earners in the U.S. pay 40% of the Federal tax dollars collected</b></li>
<li><b>The bottom 50% of earners in the U.S. pay virtually 0 income taxes</b></li>
<li><b>Entitlements exist for food, housing, services, and health care</b></li>
<li><b>Health care entitlements existed prior to 2010 (Medicaid, Medicare, State services)</b></li>
<li><b>Lower income families can get more money back than they pay in taxe</b>s</li>
</ul><div>As these facts are interpreted, it becomes clear that the top half of earners in the U.S. already 'take care' of the bottom half, right? In fact, the top 1% carries the bulk of the financial burden for achieving this redistribution. Despite this inequality, somehow the top half of the population still finds room in their hearts to be the most benevolent among us. </div><div><br />
</div><div>So, what is the reason behind such a push for more? Though the situation progressives have already managed to put in place may not be sustainable, additional entitlements and even higher taxes will wreck the economy. Why would anyone want to do this? </div><div><br />
</div><div>To add some further perspective, families living in poverty according to the U.S. Government live many fold better lives than the poor of the rest of the world. In fact, they live better and have access to incredible resources unlike any other place in the world. Unfortunately for all of us, the 'impoverished' included, the most beautiful and important entitlement provided by the U.S. is in real DANGER! What is it...</div><div><br />
</div><div><b>EVERY PERSON IN THE UNITED STATES HAS THE FREEDOM AND OPPORTUNITY TO ACHIEVE A BETTER LIFE</b>. Anyone can choose to:</div><div><ul><li>Start a business</li>
<li>Go back to school </li>
<li>Get an additional job</li>
</ul><div>Those of us that get off our ASS and do these things will experience success, happiness, and eventually wealth. Oh, and the achievers will always take care of their brothers and sisters under God and in need. </div><div><br />
</div><div>We need to move the discussion from the argument of '<s>Status Quo vs. MORE</s>' back to 'LESS vs Status Quo' and we need to do it NOW! All of our freedom and opportunity is at stake.</div><div><br />
</div><div><b>Collin Hedegard</b></div><div><a href="mailto:collinhedegard@gmail.com">@gmail.com</a></div><div><a href="http://twitter.com/CollinHedegard">@collinhedegard</a></div></div>Collinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07068344248586535462noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8033088441137784887.post-49101790623078117712009-12-13T12:41:00.000-08:002009-12-13T12:41:50.864-08:00Wait, Isn't This Good News?This has been a confusing few weeks since the proverbial 'Climate Gate' news hit the mainstream media. The science is in and apparently it's corrupted data that shows danger and a global warming crisis. Or is it? There are scientists on both sides of this debate. I'd certainly like to see some collaboration on the research and open debate on some of the data and details.<br />
<br />
A much more simple and fundamental question comes to mind when I step back and think about this... Shouldn't we be happy to hear that there's a possibility that humans aren't destroying the earth? I heard this concept thrown out there as a casual comment on conservative talk radio Friday. At first, I didn't think much of it. Then it struck me - this is great news! It's not conclusive that we are all rapidly melting, or is it freezing... I don't remember. Either way, it appears that we've got enough time now to figure things out! Fantastic!<br />
<br />
Or is it too late for some things? Emission regulations (second only to union labor) have contributed to the dismantling and destruction of the U.S. automotive industry. Billions of dollars (wait, is it billions or trillions? Doh, I've gone cross eyed) have been spent and more money promised to 'green' things up around the world. Shouldn't we make sure it's true before we go further? Shouldn't we be sure before we outlaw coal and energy sources that are less expensive and more reliable than wind and solar sources? More importantly, shouldn't we be absolutely sure the scientists are being 'scientific' and 'truthful' before we write them blank checks for designing a blueprint for future energy policy?<br />
<br />
Isn't it confusing to see these folks upset at the concept that we may not be destroying the earth as fast as many thought? I mean, how can we be anything but elated to hear it? Come on, this does not help the case of the alleged email perpetrators, does it? The fact that they seem to want this stuff to be true - it just doesn't make sense - unless... could it be the money? No, surely not that. Can we ask these guys this stuff? What exactly happens if they are exposed or proven wrong? Isn't that good news for the industrialized world and economies we live in? Let's figure it out, I'd like to know what and who to believe.<br />
<br />
Though I'm not a scientist, I remember a couple facts from biology. Humans breath Oxygen and exhale Carbon Dioxide. Plants on the other hand 'breathe' or use Carbon Dioxide for photosynthesis and emit Oxygen. If plants are good for us, and CO2 is good for them, how can it be a pollutant like the EPA declared? God designed a pretty good symbiotic relationship here, and I have a feeling he knew the capabilities and future of mankind. We'll find out, one way or another, we'll find out the truth!<br />
<br />
Watch out, you emit CO2! Do we fall under the regulatory power of the EPA now?<br />
<br />
Collin Hedegard<br />
<a href="mailto:collinhedegard@gmail.com">collinhedegard@gmail.com</a><br />
<a href="http://twitter.com/collinhedegard">http://twitter.com/collinhedegard</a>Collinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07068344248586535462noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8033088441137784887.post-87787118569872709932009-12-09T07:20:00.000-08:002009-12-09T07:22:00.280-08:00Do Americans Need a 'Recycle Bin' for Politicians?Alright, as the news feeds roll past my eye and debate presses on, we have to ask ourselves "What is going on with politicians these days?!?" Reid proclaims late last night that his caucus has reached an important compromise, and they cannot disclose the details! Why not? Why are laws being written with lobbyists and no public disclosure? This is nothing like what we were told during the campaign. The American public should demand some explanations!<br />
<br />
Regardless of your views or political affiliation, it is tough to like any politician right now. On one hand there is a Democratic Party that campaigned on reforming political behavior, transparency, and middle ground - of which they are not delivering anything other than partisan and exclusive progress of a left and radical agenda. On the other hand there is a leaderless and seemingly week GOP trying to slow the Liberal momentum. Further, the middle ground and 'undecided' folks are just frustrated and confused. <br />
<br />
Maybe it's time to move all these politicians into the 'Recycle Bin' and try some new ideas! Personally, I'd like to see someone brave enough to do what he or she believes to be right and risk getting kicked off the congressional gravy train. I expect they'll discover a constituency that respects them and will support them, even if they don't agree 100%. It's sickening to see someone compromise their views for the sake of re-election. It's also disgusting that guys like Byrd and Specter have been on the Hill for decades - have they provided a genuine or unique idea in recent history? How good is this job that they will switch parties and opinions to stay in the seats?<br />
<br />
As you may deduce from this opinion, I'm a huge proponent of limiting terms for both bodies of Congress. It's just practical and smart to demand an influx of new ideas, concepts, and personalities into any organization. Granted, elder members provide a conservative wisdom that can't be matched. However, there's no argument that today's youth are more innovative and intelligent than ever before. Maybe the voting public will chose the wise crowd, maybe not. The beauty of many successful endeavors is balance, and it is my opinion that Congress would benefit from ideas and innovation. The voters should have the opportunity to bring in some fresh meat and see what they can do!<br />
<br />
<b><br />
<br />
Collin Hedegard</b><a href="http://www.blogger.com/collinhedegard@gmail.com">collinhedegard@gmail.com</a><br />
<a href="http://twitter.com/collinhedegard">http://twitter.com/collinhedegard</a>Collinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07068344248586535462noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8033088441137784887.post-70805171870221350512009-12-04T10:49:00.000-08:002009-12-04T10:51:38.348-08:00Stimulus and TARP - Giant 2010 Campaign Funds?Reports this week indicated that over 60% of the Stimulus money had not been spent as of now. Additionally, there's about a quarter trillion left in TARP. Here's a 'stimulating' question for the Administration:<br />
<br />
<b>Why has the extremely urgent stimulus bill money not been spent urgently?<br />
</b><br />
Now, I'm sure that even 10 months is enough time to cut through some serious red tape. I'm also sure the post office isn't that slow. So, why would the government hold on to this 'critical' money when we were being held over a dark abyss by a 'stimulus' thread? <br />
<br />
Howard Dean answered this question for us. Permanent Campaign mode is in full effect. That's right, the Democratic Party Strategy is to use legislation and policy to provide ongoing support to it's own campaign efforts. Dean's idea was exposed on video released earlier this week on Fox. <br />
<br />
What does that mean? Well, quite simply the majority of the stimulus money will be spent in 2010, and likely with a concentration of spending in districts where Democratic Congress Members are in tough races. Let's just watch and see how this unfolds next year. Won't it be convenient for struggling politicians to be able to say, "Look, I am responsible for this project and these jobs. I fought for them to be in the stimulus, and here they are!"<br />
<br />
So, isn't it good that the money creates jobs? Yes, but ask the right question: Would those people liked to have gone to work in 2009? Could the projects have been funded and begun a year earlier? If this is true, then many of us are struggling for an extra year so the timing can be just so... That's truly sad. <br />
<br />
Let's close with another series of questions for you the reader or skeptic;<br />
Did you get the impression that it was extremely urgent in January 2009 that the Stimulus Bill get passed?<br />
Should the governments efforts to spend money and create jobs happen as fast as possible, especially in a time of crisis as they claimed?<br />
<br />
Here's a deeper question... Should campaign contribution reform be looked at immediately after the unemployment crisis is addressed and include the elimination of such a potential plot?<br />
<br />
Thanks for reading! Let me know what you think!<br />
collinhedegard@gmail.com<br />
<a href="http://twitter.com/collinhedegard">http://twitter.com/collinhedegard</a>Collinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07068344248586535462noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8033088441137784887.post-80598989376335840472009-11-29T07:58:00.000-08:002009-11-29T08:42:41.698-08:00Can We Continue to Max Out the US Credit Card?Some staggering news last week, the U.S. has reached its borrowing limit of $12 Trillion. For those of you that haven't seen that kind of # here it is:<br /><br /><strong>$12,000,000,000,000</strong><br /><br />Compare that to this number, the approximate U.S. Population now:<br /><br /><strong>308,000,000 </strong><br /><br />Now, keeping in mind that the population includes kids, elderly, etc. let us see what we currently have on our shoulders if we live in the U.S. today.<br /><br />12,000,000,000,000 divided by 308,000,000 = <strong>$38,961 debt per person</strong>! Wow!<br /><br />So, every man, woman, and child in the U.S. will have to cover this burden with future taxation. That's right, if we don't spend another dime and all interest was forgiven we would each have to pay nearly $39K in taxes above what the government already takes to operate the existing systems. The real truth is that burden will be levied on taxpayers, which is around 200,000,000 of us. So, scratch the 39K and let's consider it to realistically be around $60,000 for each taxpayer now.<br /><br />Is it possible that spending will stop? Even slow down? Is it likely that the countries and investors that have loaned us the money will forgive the interest on the money? I gotta tell you, I'm getting very concerned about this! It seems the answer to those questions is 'NO'!<br /><br />I'll speak for my family, which is comprised of 2 taxpayers. We are not ready to pay $2,000 more in taxes per year for the next 30 years. Remember, that is at 0% interest and no additional spending (this is not realistic). Those of you getting a couple thousand bucks each spring can kiss that goodbye. <br /><br />The timing of this terrible burden is not short of horrible. 10.2% of us are officially unemployed, though more like 17% or 18% are really out of work or underemployed. Not only does the public need a tax break now, but business owners need it immediately to spur employment. We can explore policy and should, but history tells us that Government spending doesn't stimulate hiring, only the private sector can do this. The private sector is responsible of 2/3 or 3/4 of the jobs in the U.S. Economy, and Entrepreneurs make up most of the wealthy citizens of the U.S. <br /><br />So, Obama's administration is planning to tax the rich and tax the business owners to pay for everything... aren't these the same people? If we tax the wealthy individuals that own businesses, will they just suffer the personal losses? Isn't it more likely they will take additional money from their businesses? Now, if we tax the businesses won't they have less money in their pockets to grow, expand, and most importantly <strong>HIRE </strong>more people? It seems to me that this practice will further damage the economy and further increase or maintain high levels of unemployment.<br /><br />So, what needs to happen? Well, clearly we need to reign in spending immediately. Next, we need to put a hold on Health Care Reform until we have a version <strong>CERTAIN </strong>to reduce long term costs (which may not be possible if we have to cover 30 million plus uninsured). We also need to demand that Congress and the Administration address these dire issues now. Each year that goes by we will add something like $200,000,000,000 in interest on this deficit with the lowest interest rates of all time! <br /><br />What do you think we should do? As public citizens, what can we do? Does this concern you too? <br /><br />Worried Citizen,<br />Collin Hedegard<br />collinhedegard@gmail.com<br />http://twitter.com/collinhedegardCollinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07068344248586535462noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8033088441137784887.post-17411831787796055632009-11-24T15:04:00.000-08:002009-11-24T17:45:52.791-08:00What does 'Health Care Reform' mean to you?The most pressing and current issue faces today's U.S. Congress is the Health Care Reform legislation bouncing around Capitol Hill. Without a doubt health care within the U.S. is both politically charged and hits home with every household and person. But why is it such a hot button? If everyone shares the opinion that no person should suffer needlessly, why the fuss? Maybe there is some truth behind every argument for and against reforming this complex system.<br /><br />For many, it comes down to paying for those that cannot. There's no denying the fact that it will cost real money to cover 30 or 45 million uninsured persons. There's also no denying that those who are currently paying taxes or insurance premiums will be covering those expenses. Keep in mind, the government doesn't pay for anything with it's own money. Every dollar the government has it has collected from an individual or business by way of taxation. That's the only source of revenue the gov. has. The number of supporters for handling this 'moral' issue drop when they are asked if they are willing to pay an extra $1800 per year in taxes and premiums.<br /><br />This particular issue goes a bit deeper than that. Some folks feel there's no real problem with getting medical care, regardless of whether or not a person is insured. How can this be? Well, here in the U.S. any person needing medical care can walk right in to any hospital emergency room and they will be treated. Of course, this isn't the preferred way to heal the sick - neither doctors nor patients like this. But, the bottom line is that uninsured persons will be treated this way. So, what's the problem then? Well, two questions come to mind. Should the uninsured have access to doctors before they have an emergency or need an ER? Of course they should, and ultimately it is the credit report of such persons that will suffer (they will get the treatment, be given a bill, not pay the bill, and thus collection efforts are made to recover the hospital's expenses for treatment). The second question is this, wouldn't all our medical expenses come down if hospitals and doctors didn't have to pass these costs on to us? Absolutely! It wouldn't surprise me to know hospitals build in 150% (or more) pricing because only 1 out of 3 persons will pay them. Whether uninsured persons get treatment, paying customers already cover their bill indirectly. <br /><br />Beyond paying for the uninsured, we have yet another serious issue to address. Costs for all health care is on the rise, and rising faster than wages. Clearly we cannot allow this to happen. Will the current system and insurance marketplace solve this issue? I feel that the trend toward HSA/High Deductible strategy is bringing some hope to the small business market. Combine that new concept with some consumer education on price control and we might make headway, but it will take some time for the market to correct itself. <br /><br />Who else feels like we need some honest and transparent presentation of legislation? We all know it's not as good as the Democrats say and not as bad as the Republicans claim. What should we believe? I want to know the year over year cost of this huge bill once it's fully implemented and running! I also want to know who is still left out and why! Most importantly, I want to know how it will address the long term cost control. If it can't guarantee that, there's no reason to consider it at all. The politicizing of it is a real shame. The right is obstructive and negative, but I'm sure they have some good ideas that are being ignored by Reid and Palosi. The left is upset and saying "Party of 'no'", but they have forgotten that is precisely the job of the minority party in Congress. Additionally, the left should understand that 'Bipartisan' means input from both parties, not merely Republican votes for their legislation. What happened to the transparancy and "Everyone in the room with CNN in the corner"? <br /><br />This is a great discussion! There are both moral and system issues at hand, and all of us are connected to the health care system. Personally, I don't feel like rushing a solution is right on any level. These issues are so complex, they require lots of ideas, dialogue, and debate. Surely we can come up with an efficient solution for the moral issue of extending care to the uninsured, right? What about urgently dealing with that and beginning to lay the groundwork for debating the long term control of costs to us all? That's my take, what's yours?<br /><br />Collin Hedegard<br />collinhedegard@gmail.com<br /><a href="http://twitter.com/collinhedegard">http://twitter.com/collinhedegard</a>Collinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07068344248586535462noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8033088441137784887.post-29774215289644196692009-11-24T10:37:00.000-08:002009-11-24T12:29:05.288-08:00Calling All Independent Voters!!!Independent thinkers need a place to observe fair and objective dialogue. MSNBC is selectively reporting the 'left' side of things while Fox has planted their flag right of center. Even fundamental reporting of the news has become an exercise in support of one perspective or another. For these reasons this forum exists, providing an opportunity for free spirited but friendly and civil debate. <br /><br />Please submit questions via email, twitter, or blog submission. I'll be posting some questions to kick things off, but your feedback and following will be needed, so please join me in challenging the public and our elected officials. We need good answers and solutions to a number of serious political issues and we need them now!<br /><br />To hold a consistent format, some simple ground rules need to be laid out:<br /><br />1. <strong>Please submit a question of your own or submit an answer to a posted question.</strong> Answering your own question is fine, even encouraged. Readers will appreciate the chance to review different responses and ideas for one topic.<br /><br />2. <strong>Refrain from personal attacks and demeaning comments about other submissions, as it will not be tolerated.</strong> The U.S. is unique and truly great because we all have the opportunity to share our opinion freely. Submissions with such attacks or behavior will be removed and participants will be blocked from further participation. <br /><br />3. <strong>Topics for this forum include politics, social issues, government, and economics.</strong> Submissions of other topics will be removed at the discretion of the author. <br /><br />That's enough rules, some would even argue too many! So, let's begin the conversation and ask some serious questions. Remember, it's the people who govern this nation. Politicians are accountable to us, but we need to understand what is going on. What better way than by asking 'Good Questions'?<br /><br />Enjoy the Blog! I'm looking forward to hearing your 'take'!<br /><br />Collin Hedegard, Author<br />collinhedegard@gmail.com<br /><a href="http://twitter.com/collinhedegard">http://twitter.com/collinhedegard</a>Collinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07068344248586535462noreply@blogger.com0